NEWS AND INSIGHTS | INSIGHTS

CIO Notebook: Equities Pressured Lower on AI Questions

January 27, 2025

Our view is that there is likely to be more scrutiny around AI spending in 2025 and potentially greater volatility as investors adapt to innovation in the space, including the potential for wider adoption and greater efficiencies should the cost to implement come down

Equity markets are under pressure today following the news that DeepSeek, a Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) laboratory, released an AI model late last month that replicates the performance of existing AI models but costs much less to build. Specifically, DeepSeek claims its R1 model was trained on approximately 2,000 H800 Nvidia GPUs for a total cost of under $6 million, compared with the training cost for OpenAI’s models of closer to $100 million. In addition, DeepSeek claims to match OpenAI’s o1 performance on various tasks at only 3 to 5% of the cost and are charging just 3% of what OpenAI is charging for their premium service.

The implications of this announcement, in our view, are twofold: one, it has sounded the alarm for investors that the perceived undercapacity of semiconductors for AI application could end up being neutralized much earlier or even shift to overcapacity, and two, that strict semiconductor export restrictions have not proved enough of a deterrent for Chinese companies looking to deliver innovation in this space in a potentially more efficient manner.

Offsetting these concerns is skepticism around the veracity of the news, with some sources arguing that DeepSeek actually has access to an additional 50,000 H100s, which would imply a much higher total cost of the model – possibly over $1 billion in total cost. In addition, even DeepSeek has acknowledged that without access to leading edge chips, they will likely be unable to scale up their model for a large user base. Finally, AI capabilities and the likely application of those capabilities continue to evolve, and as AI advances towards the utilization of advanced reasoning algorithms used in Agentic AI, demand is likely to remain high.

Following last week’s Project Stargate announcement, AI names soared on the excitement around an infusion of $500 billion in spending into the space and evidence of the new administration’s appetite for technology investment. The recent strength in AI semiconductors and other AI adjacent names in areas such as power generation is likely helping to drive some of the selling today; combining fears of a potential slowdown in overall spend coupled with already lofty valuations and decelerating earnings growth only compounds that headwind.

Our view is that there is likely to be more scrutiny around AI spending as we move ahead in 2025 as investors seek to understand how the massive investment being made will be monetized; in fact, this announcement may have pulled that demand for greater clarity forward. There may also be additional bouts of volatility as investors digest and adapt to this quickly changing force of innovation, which includes the potential for wider usage/adoption and greater efficiencies should the cost to implement come down. Our commitment to active investing and deep portfolio management and research capabilities should allow us to take advantage of these changes.

With that said, paramount for us is balancing the opportunities and risks of investing in this innovative space. The concentration in the U.S. equity market and in portfolios as a result of sharp gains over the past two years is brought to the fore during pullbacks such as the one we are seeing today.

Our guidance is to continue to rebalance and reallocate back to longer-term strategic targets, and specifically in terms of concentrated individual positions, execute on a prescriptive plan to bring those concentrations lower to better insulate the portfolio from exogenous and/or non-fundamental drivers of performance. Through a combination of creative strategies and a systematic approach, our team can create a solution to mitigate risk while also allowing for participation in what is likely to be a longer-term growth driver in our global economy. We encourage you to reach out to discuss in more detail how we can help.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated, returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Portfolio positioning views expressed herein are those of Neuberger Berman’s Private Wealth Investment Group, which may include those of the Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee. Asset allocation and positioning views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The Private Wealth Investment Group analyzes market and economic indicators to develop asset allocation strategies. The Private Wealth Investment Group works in partnership with the Office of the CIO. The Private Wealth Investment Group also consults regularly with portfolio managers and investment officers across the firm. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large, diversified mandates. Asset Allocation Committee members are polled on asset classes and the positional views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee or the Private Wealth Investment Group. The Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Defensive positioning generally means an underweight bias on allocations to risk assets such as equities and alternatives. Positioning views may change over time without notice and actual client positioning may vary significantly. Discussion of yield characteristics or total returns of different asset classes are for illustrative purposes only. Such asset classes, such as equities and fixed income, may have significantly different overall risk-return characteristics which should be consider before investing.

The information in this material may contain projections, market outlooks or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, including economic, asset class and market outlooks or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events, outlook and expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different than that shown here. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including any bull/bear markets, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future be market/economic cycles or behavior. Information on historical observations about asset or sub-asset classes is not intended to represent or predict future events. Historical trends do not imply, forecast or guarantee future results. Information is based on current views and market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.

Discussions of any specific sectors and companies are for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this content should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors.

Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is a registered investment adviser.

The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.