With seven months of disinflationary process in 2023 coupled with the last three months, it would appear, in our view, that enough progress has been made to allow the Fed to adopt a more accommodative approach in September.
Coming into yesterday’s Fed meeting, only a few economists and strategists predicted that the Federal Reserve (Fed) would kick off a rate-cutting cycle, so it was no real surprise that the Fed announced that it would maintain the target range of the federal funds rate of 5.25 – 5.50% for the eighth straight meeting. Consensus expectations were focused instead on the likelihood that the Fed would use this month’s meeting to telegraph a potential rate cut in September.
In our view, changes in the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement were directionally consistent with that expectation. The statement identified that while inflation has eased, it remains “somewhat elevated” versus just “elevated” in the June statement. In addition, the Fed acknowledged that the unemployment rate has “moved up but remains low” while the pace of jobs gains has “moderated.” Most importantly, perhaps, the statement noted that the Fed sees the risk to its dual mandate as moving into “better balance” with the FOMC attentive not only to inflation but to “both sides of its dual mandate.”
In his press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell continued to reiterate that the Fed is balancing “the risk of going too soon versus too late.” He stated that “if the labor market were to weaken unexpectedly, or inflation were to fall more quickly than expected, we are prepared to respond.” Powell cited the continued data-dependent approach to monetary policy decisions, cautioning that the Fed is focused on the “totality of the data” rather than specific data points, and that the path ahead is going to depend on how the economy evolves. However, he also stated that he believes that there is an ongoing normalization occurring and that “we’re in a good place here.”
In terms of next steps, we believe it is clear that the next two CPI and non-farm payroll reports, along with the July PCE release, will be critical in delivering the confidence the FOMC needs to begin cutting rates. Powell stated that there could be anywhere from no cuts to several cuts this year. However, in our view, he did appear to tamp down the notion of a 50-basis-point cut in September through both his words and body language during the press conference. We believe the immediacy of his response that such a cut was not being considered at this time likely offsets concerns from investors that the Fed is seeing a more pronounced weakening in the economy than the markets do at this point, particularly given that there was conversation in this month’s meeting around potentially cutting rates now.
We think reaction to the press conference indicates that Powell did indeed deliver the message that a September rate cut is probable, as equities and bonds both rallied and yields fell across the curve. Risks to that outcome certainly remain; namely that inflation data re-accelerates unexpectedly, much as it did in the first quarter of this year. However, with seven months of disinflationary progress in 2023 coupled with the last three months, it would appear, in our view, that enough progress has been made to allow the Fed to adopt a more accommodative approach.
VIDEO
Holly Newman Kroft Discussed Year End on CNBC
MARKET COMMENTARY
Voters Unleash Animal Spirits
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Inflation Higher in November as Fed Weighs December Cut
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Fed Cut Likely as Unemployment Rate Rises
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Inflation Comes in as No Surprise but Future Less Certain
VIDEO
Holly Newman Kroft Discussed Her Post Election Insights
MARKET COMMENTARY
Navigating the Uncertainty Before the Certainty
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: As a New Administration Waits in the Wings, the Fed Keeps Cuts Coming
INSIGHTS
CIO Notebook: Shock Infested Data Shows October Payrolls Slowing
VIDEO
Sam Petrucci Featured on CNBC’s “Power Lunch”
REPLAY
Private Wealth Year-End Investment Outlook
INSIGHTS
Cybersecurity in Focus
INSIGHTS
Election Roundtable: Trade, Taxes and Regulation
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. This material is general in nature and is not directed to any category of investors and should not be regarded as individualized, a recommendation, investment advice or a suggestion to engage in or refrain from any investment-related course of action. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Unless otherwise indicated, returns shown reflect reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Portfolio positioning views expressed herein are those of Neuberger Berman’s Private Wealth Investment Group, which may include those of the Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee. Asset allocation and positioning views are based on a hypothetical reference portfolio. The Private Wealth Investment Group analyzes market and economic indicators to develop asset allocation strategies. The Private Wealth Investment Group works in partnership with the Office of the CIO. The Private Wealth Investment Group also consults regularly with portfolio managers and investment officers across the firm. The Asset Allocation Committee is comprised of professionals across multiple disciplines, including equity and fixed income strategists and portfolio managers. The Asset Allocation Committee reviews and sets long-term asset allocation models, establishes preferred near-term tactical asset class allocations and, upon request, reviews asset allocations for large, diversified mandates. Asset Allocation Committee members are polled on asset classes and the positional views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. The views of the Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group may not reflect the views of the firm as a whole and Neuberger Berman advisers and portfolio managers may take contrary positions to the views of the Asset Allocation Committee or the Private Wealth Investment Group. The Asset Allocation Committee and the Private Wealth Investment Group views do not constitute a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Defensive positioning generally means an underweight bias on allocations to risk assets such as equities and alternatives. Positioning views may change over time without notice and actual client positioning may vary significantly. Discussion of yield characteristics or total returns of different asset classes are for illustrative purposes only. Such asset classes, such as equities and fixed income, may have significantly different overall risk-return characteristics which should be consider before investing.
The information in this material may contain projections, market outlooks or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, including economic, asset class and market outlooks or expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events, outlook and expectations will be achieved, and actual results may be significantly different than that shown here. The duration and characteristics of past market/economic cycles and market behavior, including any bull/bear markets, is no indication of the duration and characteristics of any current or future be market/economic cycles or behavior. Information on historical observations about asset or sub-asset classes is not intended to represent or predict future events. Historical trends do not imply, forecast or guarantee future results. Information is based on current views and market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Discussions of any specific sectors and companies are for informational purposes only. This material is not intended as a formal research report and should not be relied upon as a basis for making an investment decision. The firm, its employees and advisory accounts may hold positions of any companies discussed. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Investment decisions and the appropriateness of this content should be made based on an investor's individual objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors.
Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is a registered investment adviser.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC